The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 08:25, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

San Francisco is a Lonely Town

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no indication of meeting WP:NSONGS Covered by a few people but not made any impact on charts. References given do not support notability and google searches do not find anything. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 01:24, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:29, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - WP:NSONGS states "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable." Well, this did chart, in a minor way admittedly, and it has been independently released by oodles of notable artists - at least 11, by my count. I also thought the recent Nouvelle Vague remix showed that it was still considered in some way interesting, perhaps as a period piece. (I am the author of the article, btw.) Brianyoumans (talk) 02:58, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- And I have just discovered that two versions of the song charted in 1969 - a version by the songwriter, Ben Peters, was on the country charts.Brianyoumans (talk) 04:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- And now I found yet another obscure chart appearance of the song, #86 on the country charts in 1979 for someone named "Nick Nixon". I kid you not.Brianyoumans (talk) 06:04, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the creator. made the Hot 100 in one iteration, rich tradition of covers. 86.44.31.213 (talk) 05:10, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment How does it meet WP:NSONGS. A large number of covers could do it if there was enough material for a substantial article - all this article is is a list of people that have covered it - all with very little success. noq (talk) 10:56, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not a great fan of the recording by several notable artists part of WP:NSONGS, but 3 chart entries by different artists does make it notable. Richhoncho (talk) 14:54, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Agreed about the covers bit. Back in the 40s - 50s -60s, it was quite normal for a song to come out from multiple artists - singers and bands would put out many albums a year, and they would cover the currently popular tunes and old standards. In country music this lasted until more recently, and is still somewhat true, I think. So the fact that there were multiple covers would simply mean that people in the industry thought a cover could be successful, either because other covers had been or because they simply thought it had potential which the other covers hadn't mined.Brianyoumans (talk) 16:45, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.