The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under criterion G11. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sanat Sawant[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contest PROD by IP user. Subject clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSICIAN; no songs or albums in the charts at any point, no significant accolades, no significant influence within field/genre, has no entries in any reputable encyclopaedias. Fails GNG as has zero coverage outside of his own press releases. This article was protected from creation last year as a pre-emptive measure due to persistent sockpuppetry relating to Sawant in draft space. This protection was recently lifted. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt and consider lodging the creating editor in a new SPI. Nom has covered everything. Picture is up for deletion on Commons. Fiddle Faddle 15:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that all of the other edits were done while logged out. I can't find any other accounts linked with this one. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:36, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete under WP:G11 as this is a vanity page. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@GPL93 As long as it is salted. Otherwise AfD gives us a G5 opportunity to keep this material off Wikipedia Fiddle Faddle 17:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Timtrent - Nope - "A page created before the ban or block was imposed or after it was lifted will not qualify under this criterion." CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: per G11. Currently only serves Promo, would neet to be rewritten entirely. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I've tagged this as G11 as I agree with the above comments. If that IP sock removes the tag, please restore it. Thanks. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I just semi-protected the article for 24 hours because of persistent edits by IP addresses, which appear to be the article creator evading his block. —C.Fred (talk) 18:39, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Every Reference is included I think it is important to keep this entity as he’s already famous in most of the nations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:6:A0B7:1823:3DDC:F023:13F1 (talk) 18:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note. The IP is not only a single-purpose editor, but is a presumptive sockpuppet of the original editor. —C.Fred (talk) 20:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.