The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:18, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sangfor Technologies[edit]

Sangfor Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another corporation article started by someone who appears to be closely connected to the subject and repeatedly used as a dumping ground for promotional marketing material by COI (possibly paid) editors.

All the online coverage and mentions of the company I was able to find appear to be primary sources (press releases, company announcements, talks given by company representatives, etc.), trivial mentions, or thinly veiled public relations postings. There is a lack of significant, reliable secondary coverage needed to establish notability per WP:NCORP. Fails WP:NCORP, specifically WP:CORPDEPTH. EclipseDude (talk) 22:50, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 23:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 23:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.