The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Satellite Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is poorly written and short. AppaAliApsa (talk) 23:40, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per WP:RS and WP:OR..South Bay (talk) 23:59, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per G1 (patent nonsense), A1 (no context) and A3 (no content). Also as above fails WP:N (does not establish notability, and may well be WP:OR (original research). - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note that this was the original location of Satellite Party (band), which should probably be moved back if this is deleted. Adam Bishop (talk) 05:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.