- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was
Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 22:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Saundra Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I declined SNUGGUMS' PROD on the basis that the subject meets WP:BAND criterion 2, and I still believe that because Williams meets this, her article shouldn't be subject to an under-the-rug PROD that would easily expire due to low article traffic.
Nevertheless, charting two songs on a relatively obscure component chart shouldn't be an automatic exemption from failing broader notability standards, and there isn't too terribly much coverage of Williams. Beyond passing mentions and a brief AllMusic review of one of her singles, I could not find any significant secondary coverage. –Chase (talk / contribs) 20:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per insufficient coverage. I personally don't see the problem with PRODing, though. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't see enough coverage to warrant an article either, despite the two 'hits'. — sparklism hey! 09:14, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.