The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 13:05, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Scarlett Bordeaux

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two or three matches. No notable yet. No feuds, storylines or years in the business HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:22, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources showing notability. The only independent one in the article merely shows she exists and has wrestled. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No sources should never be an argument in AFD. Articles have potential for expansion and construction. That being said...

Delete, I've done my own researching and no reliable sources can establish notability for the subject. Her existence is documented, but nothing else is. Feedback ^☎ 06:36, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As HHH said, no notable yet. Maybe someday, but there's a notability problem as it stands now.LordMaldad2000 (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For the same reasons identified above. Kabirat (talk) 09:12, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.