The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 04:45, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Tucker (racing driver)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Purely a procedural nomination. Some users who apparently work for the subject of the article want it deleted, the article has been protected (by me) to stop disruption. If said users have a valid reason for deletion they can make their case here. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems notable enough, although it would be nice to have some reference citations in the article. --MelanieN (talk) 01:40, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP, I am satisfied that the Scott Tucker (racing driver) page is a fair representation of a notable person. There are enough references to him on the internet. (Milestokilo (talk) 12:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]
Delete - The article seems to assert notability but I can't find any coverage of this gentleman which would support WP:N. I can only find brief mentions in AP wires. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 15:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (X! · talk) · @234 · 04:36, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh come on, relisting for a third week? Beeblebrox (talk) 18:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.