- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Port Perry#Scugog Community Recreation Centre as no case has been made not to. Whether content should be merged can be handled at editorial discretion Star Mississippi 12:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Scugog Community Recreation Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable local arena. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uxbridge Arena and Recreation Centre. asilvering (talk) 01:45, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Canada. asilvering (talk) 01:45, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Copying part of my comment from the other AfD: I don't see sigcov of this local arena here. I think it probably exists somewhere in a newspaper archive, so someone might be able to make an article on this topic, but I don't think we're going to turn it up during this AfD, if ever. Here's the two local news websites: [1], [2]. They're not great. -- asilvering (talk) 01:47, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nom comment: a merge to the article on the town was proposed on the Uxbridge AfD and would work for this one too. I went ahead and merged the content in already, so I could withdraw this nom and WP:BLAR the article, but I strongly suspect the BLAR would be reverted, so I'd rather let this AfD play out in full. -- asilvering (talk) 21:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for more comment. I'd prefer if editors didn't carry out Merges or Redirects before an AFD has been closed, it defeats the purpose of having a community decision and could have happened without opening an AFD discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, I believe we have more than one Merge target suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.