The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination identifies an editing issue, not a deletion issue, no other users arguing to delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SecondMarket[edit]

Remove the article - this is an advertisement for the financial firm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rtannor (talk • contribs) 22:30, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article reads like it was written by an employee of the company. ⊂ Andyzweb ⊃ (Talk) 21:55, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep definitely notable, added COI tag.--UserWOLfan112 Talk 15:38, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I don't know about "speedy" but I see plenty of non-trivial mentions in reliable sources. There are definitely COI issues though. —Wrathchild ^(talk) 20:31, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.