The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: if this document is referenced by a lot of conspiracy theorists etc., then it might conceivably be notable even if it isn't real. I'd want to see some solid, reliable references to prove that before I'd consider voting to keep, though. Non-notable conspiracy theories and hoaxes don't belong here. — HaelethTalk13:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.