The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Clive Barker. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 05:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seraphim, Inc.[edit]

Seraphim, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, non-notable company, fails WP:ORG JMHamo (talk) 22:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep. It produces notable films and publishes notable book. The only question to decide is whether to keep an independent article or merge into its principal owner, the very notable Clive Barker. There are good arguments on both sides of that question, but none for outright deletion. It's not a Lucasfilm-scale business, but, like Peter Jackson's Wingnut Films, it's more consequential than most of the members of Category:Film production companies of the United States. Given the nom's failure to provide anything more than an unsupported just-not-notable rationale, there's no reason not to extend this discussion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 01:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Question - Where is the significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic? JMHamo (talk) 08:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Clive Barker as my searches found nothing convincingly better and this is questionable for solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 00:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Clive Barker as it has no separate notability. --OpenFuture (talk) 08:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.