The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There were, by the numbers, only two !votes to delete: but more than just a matter of numbers was the fact that one was completely irrelevant (no CSD criteria were applicable to this version of the article), and the other, whilst source-based was persuasively countered. Ultimately, there is no consensus from the community to see this article deleted. (non-admin closure) —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 16:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sexy Hot Award (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unremarkable award, presented by a nn entity (Sexy Hot is a redirect to Globosat#Current_networks). Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is WP:SPIP and / or passing mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:03, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete 'Nuff said.TH1980 (talk) 04:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as lacking notability on its own. The source of the award and the award ceremony might possibly be notable but the award itself does not seem to be, on its own. -The Gnome (talk) 10:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep After examining sources and media, the subject appears to be as notable as at least the Australian Adult Industry Awards, if not AVN. -The Gnome (talk) 09:03, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep There is nothing that sets it apart from other prizes such as the Australian Adult Industry Awards or Erotixxx Award. I think the big issue to be addressed is the issue of partiality, since some references are from the same group that promotes the prize, but that is no reason to delete. @The Gnome: Yes, the award is notable in Brazilian industry. It receives good and diversified media coverage. And currently it is the only Brazilian prize of the genre.Guilherme Burn (talk) 11:35, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Guilherme Burn. It seems there is an eponymous channel in Brazil, which might be more notable than the award or confuse the searches. The references (all in Portuguese) in the article, seem to support the supposedly popular notion of the "Sexy Hot" awards as being "the Oscars of Brazilian porn." They are mostly, though, from magazines such as Vice and industry websites and just one from a newspaper of note (Folha de S.Paulo). I'll look into this some more. -The Gnome (talk) 12:09, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above - Notable awards –Davey2010^Talk 14:43, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Nom's comment -- I'm not convinced that the other awards mentioned here are notable, for example, Erotixxx Award. The sourcing presented does not meet WP:NORG and is generally WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:54, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - WP: NORG does not cover very well prizes, mainly adult prizes. All the prizes mentioned are like the AVN award, less famous, but as remarkable as in their regions / countries. In general, any prize created to divulge a certain branch of work can be accused of WP: SPIP. WP: PRIZE could help define a standard?Guilherme Burn (talk) 11:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. "Awards" given by broadcasters to promote their own programming are presumably not notable; while this presumption can be overcome with evidence of independent, substantive coverage, I don't see that here. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 00:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: Your opinion is correct, But I would like you to read this report (only the passage about the award) if possible [1] (in Portuguese). It tells about the conflict between Brasileirinhas, the largest Brazilian porn producer and producers sponsored by the channel Sexy Hot. At the time of the article, 2015, the owner of Brasileirinha considers the award to be fair and relevant to the industry. In 2016/2017 Regulation [2] Playboy (Brazil) is credited as an organizer. Really the impartiality of the prize is not clear in the current issues.Guilherme Burn (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.