The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy5 (talk) 23:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seyyed Mosque (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Xfd rather than speedy to give the user a shout - maybe it could be improved into a reasonable article; otherwise not worth too much bother about. See tags on article for reasoning.  Chzz  ►  03:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i have added one source.--Mardetanha talk 22:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.