The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:53, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shayanska[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indications of notability. The "references" provided are all (to the best of my ability to understand given the limitations of Google translations from Ukrainian to English) sites advertising or promoting this product in one way or another. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article subject seems to have been referenced in an academic paper on water distillation(see article talk page for link). Unfortunately its too expensive for me to get the journal and see the context. This was originally a speedy deletion nomination contested by article creator who cleaned up the article. i kan reed (talk) 15:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Some possibly helpful searches: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the above info by Phil Bridger, I'm going make a vote and go for Keep, as it looks like this deletion nomination was a result of (reasonable) Anglocentric verification process. Seems likely to be notable in the Ukraine. i kan reed (talk) 16:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Running the Gnews hits through Gtranslate, they appear to be advertising or trivial passing mentions. Edward321 (talk) 14:07, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:22, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:10, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 05:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't pass any notability guidelines. I cant even figure out which it might fall under other than WP:GNG (Doesnt pass), and maybe WP:CORP (doesnt pass).--v/r - T P 00:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.