- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲水 11:57, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Shelby Welinder[edit]
- Shelby Welinder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
None of the sources seems to be independent, and only one of them has more than two sentences about her. She doesn't seem to meet any relevant notability guidelines. KSFT (t|c) 17:59, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Indeed, the sources don't even verify the content, not that any of them are reliable independent sources anyway. This is obviously an advitorial. John from Idegon (talk) 18:03, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 20:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 20:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 20:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 20:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.