The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sheng Man[edit]

Sheng Man (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be fictional - as a general who was somewhat cast in a similar role, historically, was referred to as Sheng Xian, not Sheng Man, without the offices stated here for Sheng Man. See Book of Jin, vol. 57 (describing Luo Xian as having defended against an attack by Sheng Xian). The rest of what "Sheng Man" was said to have done appears to be completely made up. While we do have a large number of articles under the category Category:Fictional people of the Three Kingdoms, in this case, the name "Sheng Man" is not even traceable to one of the better known fictional works. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 06:24, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:08, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:08, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:08, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:50, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 08:14, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.