This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 May 2. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was keep. Sandstein 06:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Split on request of author, since it is certainly more well-sourced than the others in the list it was previously in. The references used in this article are:
Dog breed/mix articles are somewhat unique because there's very little actual substantive fact out there re: breeds. Just a couple of paragraphs in a reliable source would make it okay for inclusion, in my view, but I can't seem to find that. — anndelion ※ 19:35, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - all information is sourced; although there are passing mentions for the name "Shinese," there is substantial information regarding modern day crossbreeding of the two - Shihtzu and Pekingese. See a Gbooks search. This also pertains to early (comparably ancient) crossbreeding of the two. I suppose all of this could be merged, but I felt that the sum of all this information on this crossbreed warranted its own article. - Theornamentalist (talk) 20:26, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]