- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Randykitty (talk) 20:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Shop LC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
created by a blocked user BBSTOP (talk) 06:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- You have tagged the page for speedy deletion so there's no need to bring this to AfD. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 06:58, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I have pulled the speedy, as I've kept a watch on this page since the first nom and deletion for it under its former Liquidation Channel name (and as a constant contributor, a notice is required to my talk page; you didn't do that). Since then I've kept constant control of the page to make sure the folks at Vaibhav Global and their accounts aren't turning it into an outright WP:ADVERT, and pretty much overwrote most of the blocked user's edits, so it's disqualified from SD under those grounds. It's a shopping network, but it has nearly national cable and satellite coverage and plenty of sourcing in the basic sense. And I always get suspicious of accounts that just arise out of nowhere and their first move is to laser-target certain pages for deletion; please declare any connections you may have for or against the subject of these pages. Nate • (chatter) 07:08, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Shop LC and Vaibhav Global both are the same shopping network and created by the blocked users User:Gauravsinghgehlot and User:HarjinderSB. Please attention both the users are the sock puppetry of User:Vkdutta4u. BBSTOP (talk) 07:16, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- **sock puppets ―Abelmoschus Esculentus
- Wikipedia:Sock puppetry BBSTOP (talk) 08:08, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(talk • contribs) 07:18, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment First, can't vote! twice in an AfD. Second, I overwrote their promotional junk as soon as the page was reposted, so it's disqualified from SD. Third, Gauravsinghgehlot never edited this page specifically. Please state a policy-based reason for deletion besides removing banned user contribs which were addressed already three years back and declare any conflicts.. Nate • (chatter) 07:20, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 07:21, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 07:21, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 07:21, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 07:21, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete you saying Gauravsinghgehlot never edited this page but he is the banned user and sock puppet of user:Vkdutta4u. and as per my understanding a sock puppet user is that who handles multiple accounts. Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. and it clearly proves that both the pages Vaibhav Global and Shop LC are created by the same user user:Vkdutta4u who is banned and have a close connection with the company. BBSTOP (talk) 07:54, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Once again, you cannot vote for your deletion. Stop adding "delete" to further comments. And as I will reiterate again, as soon as I saw their promotional edits, I removed them and re-wrote the page in full to be as neutral as possible (I expected the re-creation and kept the page on my watchlist after the first deletion, specifically to make sure their edits didn't stick). Their original content is all but gone from this page. G5 can't be used three years after the page was created; multiple users have already all but obliterated the original PROMO tone of this page. Nate • (chatter) 07:59, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.