The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural Close The article's already been speedy deleted under wp:G3. (non-admin closure) Neonchameleon (talk) 11:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Short Love Story

[edit]
Short Love Story (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is just a story that someone decided to "publish" on Wikipedia. I thought this would qualify for Speedy Deletion but i didn't find any criteria that could apply. WikiWisePowder (talk) 00:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Notecardforfree: Can this be used since the page is in article space? WP:U5 is for user space pages. WikiWisePowder (talk) 01:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WikiWisePowder: My mistake ... it's been a long day and my mind is playing tricks on me. Maybe this qualifies for speedy via WP:G6 (unambiguously created in error)? I've always said there needs to be a speedy deletion category for pages that are clearly not intended to be encyclopedia articles so that we don't have to pigeonhole these pages into other speedy deletion categories. In any event, WP:NOTWEBHOST should mandate deletion if speedy doesn't work. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 01:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it looks like it's already been tagged per WP:G3 (vandalism). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 01:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More