The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 01:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shradha Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable CEO of a non-notable company. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:25, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:45, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep (1) Called the biggest story teller of India's digital space. (2) Listed amongst world's 500 LinkedIn influencers (3) Chosen as "5 Women Entrepreneurs in India that you should know about!" (4) Adequate citations to establish GNG (Evidence on article page). Yogesh Khandke (talk) 11:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(5) The Hindu wrote about her as one who has shattered the glass ceiling. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 11:58, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(6) LinkedIn's most vieved CEO under Internet category. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 12:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep --Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 14:03, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• keep - passes WP:GNG --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• keep A quick review of the news results from the link above suggests there are a reasonably significant number of articles about her in recognised news outlets which even at a first glance suggests she passes notability. There are references to her in the links to research similarly. She would seem to pass. ☕ Antiqueight ^haver 02:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Plenty of secondary sources.--Ipigott (talk) 10:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There are enough RS to pass GNG, as shown by Yogesh Khandke. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Concur with above and note that she has won multiple awards. Crtew (talk) 19:03, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.