The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 20:37, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shruti Kapoor[edit]

Shruti Kapoor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:BASIC due to lack of reliable sources Marvellous Spider-Man 17:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• It seems more likely that the organisation is notable than Kapoor herself, so maybe it would be best if this was refactored as an article about Sayfty rather than its founder. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:50, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 08:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 08:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - additional reliable sources added; article cleaned up. Needs expansion, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 04:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep - Looks like there may be just enough to satisfy WP:BIO. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Leaning keep per available sources. Appears to be somewhat notable. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:13, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.