The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. SoWhy 18:22, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Siddharth Ramaswamy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puff piece about a non-notable technician. Full of peacock terms and contains references to paid-for awards. the only sources found were social media, blogs and passing mentions. fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILMMAKER Domdeparis (talk) 10:35, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:05, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Non-notable cinematographer fails WP:NFILMMAKER and WP:GNG.  FITINDIA  05:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.