The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn due to sourcing rescue. Bearcat (talk) 23:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sigmund Sobolewski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is effectively an unreferenced WP:BLP; while it does cite a significant number of "references", every single one of them is a bare URL that links to a dead or nonexistent page, which means that the article's content is currently unverifiable until someone can find new ones. As always, I'm willing to withdraw this nomination if somebody can salvage it with updated and properly formatted referencing, but it's distinctly not properly referenced in its current form. Delete if referencing hasn't been repaired by close; while he's presumably notable enough to be kept if the article is referenced properly, we can't keep articles that nobody's prepared to work on maintaining or cleaning up. Bearcat (talk) 17:30, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep until someone can look into locating additional references.Turqoise127 18:49, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Every source except one turns out to be available. The links have been updated. --Arxiloxos (talk) 20:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, consider this nomination withdrawn. Bearcat (talk) 23:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.