The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Renata 05:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Silent Kimbly

[edit]

Article makes no assertions to the comic's notability beyond being popular on Livejournal. As such, it fails WP:WEB. There're about 800 google hits for "Silent Kimbly" webcomic, none of which would suggest notability that isn't contained in the article. Unless someone can provide further notability, delete. Brad Beattie (talk) 02:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. wtfunkymonkey 02:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Would be a speedy if it weren't for the book. MER-C 03:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep, as you can find Google hits for this and it is a widely read webcomic. Sharkface217 04:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Google hits aren't reliable sources. Please cite a third-party reliable source to indicate something about this webcomic. ColourBurst 05:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Almost everything on the internet gets some google hits, but that doesn't mean everything can have an article. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless reliable sources are provided. shotwell 05:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete don't see notability; book article w/ this inclued? SkierRMH,06:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. It's a prominent comic. Perhaps an addition to WikiProject Webcomics would be appropriate? That could make it better. ~ EdBoy^[p]\_[m]/^[c] 21:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - An alexa rank in the millions and a self published book don't make it notable. This is nowhere near as prominent or notable than other deleted websites such as General Mayhem and Soompi. - hahnch e n 01:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet our content policies starting with no verifiable information from third-party reputable sources. -- Dragonfiend 06:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.