The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Silq[edit]

Silq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New quantum programming language that likely fails WP:GNG. Based entirely on primary and PR-like sources. WP:BEFORE mostly shows the same, plus unrelated topics with the same name. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete maybe per WP:TOOSOON? Per nom, I mostly only see promotional sources online. I'm not well-familiar with the tech world, but the only coverage I see is this article from TechCrunch (which wins a yellow "no consensus" flag at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources) and very weirdly, this Silq-focused textbook from authors who weren't the original paper's authors. Not sure what to make of the textbook, but generally it doesn't look like Silq is the subject of substantial independent coverage. It was only published recently, so perhaps someday... Ajpolino (talk) 21:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to this before deleting Silq, -> Silq is a new high-level programming language for quantum computers. This is a good article, as it is a page for freely released programming language. Trinity112233 (talk) 21:11, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• No additional citation is needed to verify through multiple sources for the article Silq. The article was already verified with strong references and it did not infringe the Wiki policy. Trinity112233 (talk) 20:12, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete None of the citations, including the article mentioned by Trinity112233 establish significant coverage in secondary sources. Citing the conference talk where the language was introduced does not pass WP:NOTABILITY. PianoDan (talk) 17:41, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and PianoDan.4meter4 (talk) 23:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.