The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. If some editor wants to work on a Draft version of this article, you can contact me or inquire at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 03:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore at the 2026 Asian Games[edit]

Singapore at the 2026 Asian Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. It's still too early for this article to exist. Created by the same user who created Vietnam at the 2026 Asian Games which I also nominated for deletion. CycloneYoris talk! 00:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Return to Draft Traumnovelle (talk) 02:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify per Frank. S5A-0043Talk 08:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Struck above after remembering the 6 month rule for draftspace. Delete. S5A-0043Talk 14:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree strongly. It is very reasonable to have some level of information about a country's participation in international competition two years ahead of time. Therefore, drafspace would be the exact opposite of an indefinite holding area If this proves not to be the case, the draft can easily be deleted in October 2024. Frank Anchor 15:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • For most events like this, the qualifying tournaments will be at most a year before the event i.e. in 2025. Unless there is evidence that there are 2026 Asian Games qualifiers this year, and so we'll know some qualified Singaporean competitors in 6 months time, then draftspace is not needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, opinion divided between editors advocating Draftification and those arguing for Deletion. This might come down to No consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:46, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 00:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftifying would be completely pointless, since there isn't any valuable content to preserve. Better to delete now than later. CycloneYoris talk! 03:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.