The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 04:41, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Winston and the Commons[edit]

Sir Winston and the Commons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason for deletion - No reliable sources are used. Obscure and non-notable band. This is a blog [1] . This is a blog [2]. This is a wiki [3]. This does not seem to pass GNG [4] This does not pass GNG [5]. Very little information from a google news search or google books search. [6] [7] 173.52.99.208 (talk) 12:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC) nominated on behalf of an unregistered editor (by request) and with no opinion -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 13:29, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - This article receives more than enough mention on compilation albums and write-ups. May I remind you that pre-Internet bands sometimes do not get a wealth of sources, yet this one gets respectable amounts and is still talked about.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 14:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment How does this pass GNG? Unreliable sources as per WP:USERG, and WP:RSSELF. 173.52.99.208 (talk) 17:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

keep I should mention two things. One, that "blog" is actually an extensive interview. The other blog was replaced by a booklet presumably with extensive coverage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ALongStay (talk • contribs) 17:03, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Unreliable sources as per WP:USERG and WP:RSSELF. Again, no mention as to how this passes GNG! 173.52.99.208 (talk) 17:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Not only have several of their songs been included in compilations, but their song, "We're Gonna Love" is included on Back from the Grave series, which is one of the best-known and most high-profile in the genre. The group's EP was released on Sundazed Records, a relatively large-scale operation. In Mike Markesich's book, Teenbeat Mayhem, in the section that ranks the top 1000 garage rock songs of all time, voted on by a panel of noted garage writers and experts (out of the more than 16,000 US-recorded songs mentioned in the book), "We're Gonna Love" ranks #416, placing it in the top 500 American garage rock records.^[1] So, the band should be considered notable--they warrant an article at Wikipedia. Garagepunk66 (talk) 00:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.