The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:54, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Another non-notable band. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 14:56, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
I think this band is not notable. The article is sourced to Discogs and Prog Archives, none of them are reliable. I looked them up and I could not find anything besides the usual unreliable stuff like databases and blogs. Most of the results are not even about this band. I also looked up the album and all I found was databases, blogs, Youtube videos and retail sites. Like in the case of unreliable bands, there are some album reviews scattered here and there but those sites look like blogs to me. So no reliable sources whatsoever. The article has a notability tag on it since March 2020, and the band has no article on German Wikipedia either (I find that a bit strange since they have articles about almost every band in the world :) It also does not help that this is another of those bands who have a really basic name so adding keywords like "Germany", "German" or "progressive rock" (or searching with quotation marks) does not help either as the results are just the words scattered in different sites, or if they are about the band, they are blogs, databases and retail sites. So with all that said I think Sitting Bull is not a notable band. Update: I think the article of their sole album can go as well.GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 14:54, 2 July 2020 (UTC)