The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article does not have the reliable secondary sources to establish notability. Davewild (talk) 09:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slige[edit]

The reasoning used for Doom Builder, another Doom editing utility, seems to apply here. Prod was contested apparently on the basis that Slige can be compared and contrasted with other Doom editing utilities. I am a lifelong Doom fan, but these programs are never going to meet the notability standard for a general-interest encyclopedia. Xeriphas1994 (talk) 23:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another 03:58, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - although I can find download links and blogs, I cannot find any articles about Slige itself, so there are no reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 11:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree. Deb (talk) 14:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable software. As above, I cannot find any articles or sources about this software, other than trivial download link style coverage. Not surprising, given how niche a market this software caters for. Still, apparently not high-profile enough to meet the WP:N criteria. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.