The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G11, entirely promotional. DGG ( talk ) 03:25, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sneal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a neologism which does not seem to be in wide enough use to warrant an article: in fact, as can be seen from the reference list, it seems almost to be a proprietary term of Dr. Raymond A. Powell and his site snealtime.com. From WP:NEO: Articles on neologisms are commonly deleted, as these articles are often created in an attempt to use Wikipedia to increase usage of the term... Neologisms that are in wide use but for which there are no treatments in secondary sources are not yet ready for use and coverage in Wikipedia." Contested PROD. JohnCD (talk) 21:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —JohnCD (talk) 21:36, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per my PROD and JohnCD's nomination rationale. SmartSE (talk) 21:47, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 22:45, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism. Effectively all the references are to this Raymond guy. Initial creator has made no other article edits outside of this page: Dr J Radcliffe (talk · contribs). OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 23:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.