The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Steel 23:07, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to this nn-webcomic, the webcomic author Steven Stwalley is nominated. Soapy the Chicken, seen here is a webcomic with no Alexa rank. It manages to get 60 unique Google links. This fails WP:WEB, WP:V. - Hahnchen 01:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Nishkid64 01:46, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not significant enoughMarminnetje 01:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both per WP:WEB and WP:BIO. —dustmite 01:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable webcomic created by a non-notable person. Fails WP:WEB and WP:BIO criteria.--TBCTaLk?!? 02:14, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above.UberCryxic 02:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and TBC. — riana_dzasta _{wreak havoc|damage report} 03:00, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable webcomic. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 03:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is not notable now, and doesn't really meet WP:WEB or WP:NOTE criteria. --LiverpoolCommander 09:07, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable Localzuk ^(talk) 11:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.