The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 18:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Socially Useful Productive Work (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DePRODed twice by creator. concerns were: 1. Unsourced and historically insignificant. No importance demonstrated for an encyclopedia article. and 2. Original research. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:54, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At the time it was listed for deletion it was a perfectly legitimate nomination. It remains to be seen if the community accepts your new version as encyclopedic. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.