The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under criterion G11, blatant promotion. The text appeared to be copied from the official website (although the official site was down for summmer/holiday break, so that couldn't be confirmed). The tone was clearly aimed to promote the group, and the article was created by a user with a conflict of interest. —C.Fred (talk) 16:19, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Society for Undergraduate Science Students (SUSS)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Student organisation with no indication of WP:notability. noq (talk) 15:40, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I've also begun discussion at COI noticeboard [1]. Article's creator is a WP:SPA, several times removing maintenance templates without addressing the sourcing concerns. 76.248.147.199 (talk) 15:45, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:59, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Non notable student group. research has turned up nothing that meets WP:ORG. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:03, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.