The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:51, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sohin Shah

[edit]
Sohin Shah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion from blocked sock on not notable individual. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Current bombardment of sources is passing mentions and PR. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:08, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 02:18, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 02:18, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 02:18, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 02:18, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.