The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ged UK 13:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sonshiny Day[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a television series that does not seem to be notable. Unreferenced. No sources directly evident from Google, GNews, Gbooks. BenTels (talk) 16:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. There are at least the possibility of sources ([1], [2]) but I'm not certain they are adequate in terms of depth of coverage and independence. I would suggest a redirect to Trinity Television, however that article was speedied A7 back in 2009, which doesn't inspire a great deal of confidence in articles about their individual programs. If this is salvaged, POV issues will also need to be addressed. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 16:17, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless something better in references appears. From the article, it doesn't look to have been up there with Sesame St or even down there with Teletubbies. Peridon (talk) 21:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. 00:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.