The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 20:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Soufiane AIT[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been listed at WP:PNT for two weeks without any progress in translation, does not appear to be especially notable, prod declined Jac16888 ^Talk 21:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Puff piece, plain and simple, barely passes G11 speedy deletion criterion. None of the references are of the kind we deem reliable to establish notability. Not worth the trouble of translating. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 21:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would also note that the article is in French and there is no corresponding article in the French Wikipedia, despite his notability such as it is being mainly in the French-speaking world. We might want to offer to transwiki this to the French Wikipedia, see if they consider it notable, and possibly translate at some point if they do, but if not then the case against it seems rather clearcut. - Jmabel | Talk 20:38, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The editor who created it here did so after it was deleted on the French Wikipedia, apparently it doesn't meet their criteria [1]--Jac16888 ^Talk 20:43, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, then just delete. - Jmabel | Talk 21:17, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Puffery. I agree about the lack of need for translation (and didn't bother to earlier...). Plenty of refs - I can't see anything worth tuppence there. Peridon (talk) 10:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.