The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure of discussion started in wrong place). Peridon (talk) 10:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

South Wales Coalfield

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've listed this page for deletion in an attempt to resolve a problem of capitalization. All the words in the page title South Wales coalfield should be capitalized, but the page can't be moved as South Wales Coalfield already exists. Deleting the latter would make room for it. Obscurasky (talk) 08:39, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This should not be in Articles for Deletion as the page is a redirect. The nominator is quite happy that it should remain as a redirect as he was only trying to tidy up a list - I quote from User talk:Obscurasky

"Thanks for the reply. I don't feel really strongly about this; it caught my eye because it appears to be the only coalfield on Wikipedia that isn't capitalised (List of coalfields). I had thought about simply cutting and pasting the whole article, but I know that's against Wiki protocol - so I thought I'd try and do it by the book (mistake). Thank you for your offer to attempt a non-admin closure - I think that would be the best option."

I am performing a non-admin closure as discussed with the nominator and as pure housekeeping. Peridon (talk) 10:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.