The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Southtree[edit]

Southtree (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this is clearly a business, and there doesn't seem to be anything extraordinary about it. Less than one percent of all businesses are influential enough to need there own wikipedia page, and i see no reason why this is one of them. Joshzz42 (talk) 15:44, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Small local firm, 10 years old, nothing to suggest notability. Google News finds nothing at all from Reliable Sources - just a couple of items in a hyperlocal news blog. --MelanieN (talk) 19:37, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 19:39, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Nothing apart from Facebook and twitter (and YouTube). --Wikishagnik (talk) 20:03, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.