The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Neutrality^talk 23:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sovereign Choctaw Nation river clan

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

POV content fork of Choctaw Nation Mississippi River Clan that asserts, among other things, full sovereignty outside of the "United States corporation". Hemlock Martinis (talk) 22:32, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT DELETE this listing, if a listing must be removed please delete listing for Choctaw Nation Mississippi river clan, not Sovereign Choctaw Nation river clan Tribe does have Sovereignty outside the UNITED STATES CORPORATION posted by Sovereignchoctawnation 22:51, 26 May 2011
Delete — No sources available, WP:NOTSOAPBOX. — TransporterMan (TALK) 23:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No verified notability. Drmies (talk) 00:22, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Purely promotional article, written to promote a particular set of opinions, which are completely unsourced, and constitute original "research". JamesBWatson (talk) 10:16, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note per Wikipedia:CANVAS#Appropriate_notification, I am giving notice that I have invited Heiro, Uyvsdi, and User:67.235.129.179 to participate in this discussion in light of their substantial participation in the Choctaw Nation of Florida discussion. I would have also invited the main "keep" participant in that discussion but he, GregJackP, has been indefinitely blocked. — TransporterMan (TALK) 13:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per all of the above, specious WP:OR and chestthumping weirdness not grounded in available facts. He iro 13:22, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The author is clearly involved with and promoting the organization. The group does get a fair amount of web hits, but they are mostly social networking sites and wikipedia mirror sites - couldn't find mentions in newspapers. History section is mostly about Choctaw people as a whole, not this organization. Notability is not established, and citations are lacking. -Uyvsdi (talk) 16:23, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]
Delete This one's obvious; the ALLCAPS rings a bell... lemme look at the other one (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choctaw Nation Mississippi River Clan) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 16:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "If you are not a member of this tribe, please do not edit this page" did it for me. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.