The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No Consensus default to keep; non-admin closure. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spider Player

[edit]

Non-notable software; just a list of features and article reads like an advertisment. No substantial references for this product will come from third-party sources, and the only available references are likely reviews. ((prod)) was removed by User:RentGen without comment, so listing at AfD. Mikeblas (talk) 13:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a tough one. There really don't seem to be many sources; the only links I can find are mirror sites for downloading it. There are an awful lot of them, including even [ZDnet but I couldn't find even one real review of it. Weak delete--TexasDex ★ 19:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Article needs a through rewrite, but worthy of being kept. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:51, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Informative, and no shameless plugging. Doesn't need to be deleted. I found the article slightly helpful when I was looking for media players myself. (Slightly = I don't need to download Spider Player ;)). Nshuks7 21:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. There are sources, but we need to remember that Wikipedia is not a directory of media players or anything else, and there's nothing to decide what makes this one any different from all the rest.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 11:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Nom. Twenty Years 15:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.