The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. Creator moved article to draft space. No prejudice against renomination if moved back to article space. (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn (talk) 10:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spinosaurus (Jurassic Park) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost the entire article (81%) is direct verbatim of this fandom. It's mostly uncited and no attribution given. Removing the uncited chunk and the remaining could just be included in Dinosaurs in Jurassic Park. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 00:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 October 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Article creator has draftified the article. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 23:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.