The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 04:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spredfast[edit]

Spredfast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches have found a few several links at News and Highbeam but nothing particularly suggesting solid in-depth coverage to suggest solid independent notability, the current links are not convincing enough and the NYTimes link never actually mentions them apparently and, even if it had, there's nothing for inherited notability because of that event. SwisterTwister talk 06:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Just commercial PR blurb. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.