- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 17:38, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Spring Creek Cave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not sure if it meeets notability standards for a public place. Charlie the Pig (talk) 20:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - My interpretation of WP:GEOLAND is that the threshold of notability for natural features is somewhat lower than the GNG's "significant coverage", since features that have information beyond statistics and coordinates are deemed notable. I added a source [1] and additional information to the article, and the Texas Almanac also has an entry for the cave [2]. Altamel (talk) 19:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND, named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. This includes mountains, lakes, streams, islands, etc. I have added three ((cite book))s. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 16:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.