The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stacy Burke[edit]

Stacy Burke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails all recent versions of WP:PORNBIO, no other significant basis for notability, but unverifiable claim to have hooked up with Hefner. 2005 VfD debate talked mostly about Google hits, no longer considered appropriate basis for establishing notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:10, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's simple. She fails WP:PORNBIO, regardless of how many ghits she gets. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:35, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:51, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - She satisfies the third criteria of PORNBIO in that she's appeared numerous times on The Girls Next Door, and one episode was entirely about her wedding. That show verifies that she was one of Hef's many girlfriends and a book by Izabella St. James describes what happened to the relationship. From memory also, she's made appearances on several different other shows. She may be considered a bondage icon and was one of the first bondage queens to have a website with her fetish a go go site. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Making an appearence and being a regular cast member are different. Niteshift36 (talk) 01:26, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:02, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Sufficiently notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.