The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Barackman[edit]

Stephen Barackman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Not notable. See, for example, Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL There does not appear to be enough reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy to maintain an independent article on this topic. -- Suntag ☼ 03:11, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Quite a few hits on Google, so there's no lack of third-party sources. However, the subject itself is non-notable, and there's conflict of interest as well; the article was posted by user "SBarackman." sixtynine ^{• speak, I say •} 06:21, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Clearly non-notable, autobiographic article. Found no hits on news search. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:58, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.