The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 02:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen T. Chang[edit]

Stephen T. Chang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. RobP (talk) 23:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. RobP (talk) 23:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Seriously? I thought personal bios got treated differently than other topics. How is a book article relevant? And, if I am wrong about that, is the criteria now just what was done in the past for any article? Then let me suggest using THIS article I wrote as the criteria... It was deleted (twice), even with 34 citations, including The Atlantic, People and the NYT. And by the way, there is only a single reference (not the two listed above - where did THOSE come from?) used in this article, and it is the subject's own book. And it is used only to support a single paragraph. I have never seen a bio article more in need of an AFD than this one. RobP (talk) 21:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.