The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:59, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steven L. Thorsen

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This BLP has remained unsourced for over three years. Although the information in the article makes him sound notable, I can find no independent sources to confirm the information and verify that he meets the notability criteria as outlined at WP:ARTIST Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I also looked for sources for this one at least twice, but had no luck.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 18:09, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Promo piece for an obscure artist. -Uyvsdi (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]
Delete, I cannot find coverage in reliable sources. --Nuujinn (talk) 16:08, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- Reach Out to the Truth 16:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as only source of bio a promotional piece by one gallery, no evident notability. . dave souza, talk 23:16, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources other then existing EL's found. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 23:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lets try:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rich Farmbrough, 15:50, 28 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Delete Nothing so far. incidentally the tags should generally be dated when they are added, though it hardly matters. Rich Farmbrough, 16:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Note Thorson seems to have taken the name "Painted Bear" - also the copyright images would appear to be released under multi-license. Shame in a way they have copyright in their names, but there is a tendency to think WP stuff is totally free, whereas it is attribution-licensed. Rich Farmbrough, 16:06, 28 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.