The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still Pending[edit]

Still Pending (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete - This is 4th nomination for AFD. This article about a non-notable boy band group. This article is no link from other wikipedia articles (Orphan template is tagging), and All links only namespace page and redirects. Noylonm (talk) 12:13, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep. This is not a reason for deletion. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 12:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• No assertion of notability in opening paragraph. LiamUK (talk) 13:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is a syntactic argument. The band's notability is asserted throughout the article and via multiple external sources. The fact that the band's notability is not clearly asserted in the opening paragraph should not be of any consequence in this discussion (IMHO) PeachWriter66 (talk) 14:50, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:11, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep. Orphan template is not sufficient grounds for deletion. Article has passed notability requirements on 3 previous occasions. Noylonm appears to have no contribution history other than the nomination of this article for Speedy (not that this is grounds for Keep, but I thought it was worth noting). PeachWriter66 (talk) 14:45, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep: No good reasons given for deletion. Passes WP:MUSIC. Joe Chill (talk) 15:27, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Proceedural keep and a trout for the nom.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Klat" 12:09, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Per Special:Contributions/Noylonm, perhaps you would like to use a minnow. ;-) King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:30, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.