The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 16:26, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Straits Quay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested proposed deletion - nearly identical re-creation after having been deleted about year and a half ago (deleted version here). No third-party references, Google search hasn't returned anything but business profiles and advertising. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:27, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:28, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:28, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not Notable. Nothing found in Reliable sources. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:54, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not Notable. Belongs on Wikivoyage:Penang if anywhere. Bazj (talk) 09:31, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• delete unreferenced to back multiple claims. LibStar (talk) 20:08, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Total lack of references, many ungrammatical sentences, was apparently already deleted.Rambunctious Racoon (talk) 09:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.