The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:56, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sudalaimuthu Palaniappan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see any indication that the subject's work is widely cited enough to meet WP:NACADEMIC, nor does there appear to be enough independent coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. The subject has a profile on ResearchGate which claims 5 published papers and 37 citations (which would mean a maximum h-index of 5, a rather low number), and a Google Scholar search does not turn up any better-cited works. It's not impossible that there are some papers that aren't being properly indexed by either of those sites, but I was unable to find anything by doing an internet search of the subject's name. The "South Asia Research and Information Institute" that the article credits the subject with founding similarly seems to have had no significant impact. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable; promotional article. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 02:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:44, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on account of subject failing WP:NACADEMIC. There are a few citations in some books' bibliographies and little else. This is a propping up exercise, more than anything, with possibly a WP:COI issue. --The Gnome (talk) 12:53, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.